What should be done with bugs?

What should be done with bugs? - briefly

Identify, prioritize, and assign each defect to a responsible developer for resolution, then verify the fix through regression testing. Document the process to prevent recurrence and inform stakeholders.

What should be done with bugs? - in detail

Effective management of software defects requires a systematic approach that moves from detection to resolution and prevention. The process can be divided into distinct stages:

  • Identification – Use automated testing, static analysis, and user reports to capture anomalies. Record each issue with a unique identifier, reproducible steps, environment details, and severity level.
  • Classification – Assign categories such as functional error, performance regression, security vulnerability, or usability flaw. Prioritize based on impact on users, business value, and regulatory requirements.
  • Assignment – Route the defect to the appropriate development team or individual with the necessary expertise. Include clear acceptance criteria and a target resolution date.
  • Resolution – Implement a fix, refactor code, or adjust configuration. Verify that the change addresses the root cause without introducing regressions. Document the rationale and code modifications.
  • Verification – Conduct regression testing, code review, and, if applicable, security validation. Confirm that the issue no longer manifests under all documented conditions.
  • ClosureMark the defect as resolved only after successful verification and stakeholder sign‑off. Archive the record for future reference and metrics collection.

Continuous improvement relies on analyzing defect trends. Aggregate data on frequency, cause, and time‑to‑fix to identify systemic weaknesses. Apply preventive measures such as:

  • Strengthening coding standards and guidelines.
  • Enhancing test coverage, especially for high‑risk modules.
  • Integrating static analysis tools into the build pipeline.
  • Conducting regular code reviews focused on common error patterns.

By following this disciplined workflow, organizations reduce the cost of defect remediation, improve product reliability, and maintain stakeholder confidence.